Erasmus+ Youth Exchange (KA152-YOU)Rovies, North Evia, Greece1–10 September 2027
Thyme Out: Leaf in the Moment Ten days out of the loop, in an olive grove by the sea.
The ten days at a glance
A side view of the Rovies coast: the sea, a campsite in an olive grove, and the hillside above it. Ten numbered stops on the path, one for each day of the exchange. Dragging or using arrow keys walks along the path; the description of each day appears below.
A ten-day Youth Exchange for 32 young people from Greece, Serbia, Poland and Bulgaria on burnout, rest and attention, built with what is free: daylight, walking, silence, cooking, other people. They leave with a card kit they wrote themselves, and run it at home.
- 4countries
- 28 + 4participants + group leaders
- 10days, eight of them working
- 1free card kit, written by participants
- 0 €cost to any participant
Project rationale
Why this project
Ask a group of young people how they are, and a surprising number answer “tired”. Not tired from one late night, but the kind of tired that a weekend does not fix. They are studying and working at the same time, applying for things that ask for experience they have not been allowed to get yet, answering messages at midnight, and doing all of it while keeping up an account of a life that looks relaxed. Rest has quietly become one more thing to be good at, and when it does not work, young people tend to blame themselves rather than the pace they are keeping.
The World Health Organization (ICD-11) describes burn-out as a syndrome resulting from chronic stress that has not been successfully managed, with three parts. Young people recognise all three in themselves long before anyone is paying them a salary: in university, in unpaid internships, in volunteering, in caring for family members, in the constant small work of being available. Because none of that is called a job, nobody calls what happens to them burnout either. So it goes unnamed, and something unnamed is very hard to act on.
There is a second gap next to the first one. Recovery has been sold back to young people as a product: meditation apps with subscriptions, wellness weekends, expensive retreats, courses on rest. The version that costs nothing has been forgotten: going outside, walking without a destination, sitting still somewhere green or blue, using your hands, noticing weather, being bored for twenty minutes. Every young person already has access to some version of it: a park, a hill, a shoreline, a patch of trees behind a supermarket. Access is not the barrier. The habit is, and so is the belief that it counts as doing nothing.
of Europeans had experienced an emotional or psychosocial problem, such as feeling depressed or anxious, in the previous twelve months — Eurobarometer on mental health, October 2023, as reported by the European Commission.
The Commission’s 2023 Communication on a comprehensive approach to mental health puts forward twenty flagship actions and names boosting the mental health of children and young people as one of its aims. In June 2025 the Council of the EU called for greater efforts to protect the mental health of children and teenagers in the digital era. The problem is recognised at the highest level. What is missing at ground level is something ordinary and repeatable that a young person can actually do on a Tuesday.
We are not going to teach young people about stress. We take them out of the loop for ten days and let them find out what they can build with almost nothing.
Then we ask them to turn what worked into something the next group can use.
Objectives
Four objectives, one word each
Every one of them is testable by the last day. That is deliberate: a project about slowing down should not need a paragraph to explain what it is for. The four words are also the four suits of the card kit the participants build. Tap a card to turn it over.
Erasmus+ priorities. Inclusion and diversity: burnout is not distributed evenly, selection is built to reach those carrying more, and no exercise depends on money, equipment, fitness or experience. Green: one full working day is spent in a landscape that burned in 2021 and is growing back. Digital: the part of digital competence that is usually skipped — safety and wellbeing — tested as an experiment on themselves. Participation: participants write the group agreement, adjust the second half of the programme, write every word of the kit and run their own local activities.
Competences. Personal, social and learning to learn is the core (LifeComp P1 self-regulation, P3 wellbeing, L3 managing learning, S1 empathy). Multilingual, because English is used for something harder than small talk. Citizenship, from comparing how rest, ambition and success are framed in four societies. Entrepreneurship, in the last three days, when an idea becomes an object and then an event. Cultural awareness and expression, in the making. Digital, in the offline experiment and the screen audit.
Venue
Rovies, North Evia
A seaside campsite in an olive grove, 1 to 10 September 2027: an arrival day, eight working days and a departure day. Accommodation, meals, working space and the sea are on the same site, so nobody travels during the day. Participants sleep in rented tents and mobile homes, which keeps cost and footprint low and puts the group outdoors from the moment it wakes up. Meals are taken at the campsite tavern, open through September. The work happens in a shaded common area under the olive trees, on the beach and on the hillside paths above the village.
Early September in Evia is hot, so days start early, the middle of the day is a long break, and the heavier sessions sit in the morning and late afternoon.
North Evia burned in 2021 and is growing back unevenly, which makes the point about recovery better than any slide.
Running an activity in a campsite rather than a hotel is its own lesson: low-cost accommodation, an outdoor programme, materials that are mostly gathered or reused, and catering built around local seasonal food add up to a mobility with a small footprint and a small budget. Partners who have not worked this way before leave knowing it is possible.
Cities placed by latitude and longitude; not a geographic map. Groups travel together; bus, train and ferry are looked at before flights, and within Greece the journey to Rovies is by road and ferry, with the host arranging every transfer.
Participants and partners
Thirty-four people on site
Four organisations each send one group of eight: seven participants and one group leader. Two facilitators from the host team bring the total to 34. Country balance is built into the structure, with exactly the same number of places for every organisation. Participants are between 18 and 26 — the stretch of life where this pressure is concentrated: final years of study, first jobs and unpaid internships, moving out or failing to, doing everything at once with no template for it. Hover or tap a figure.
Selection. Each organisation runs an open call at least three months before the activity, carrying the infopack so applicants know exactly what the week involves, followed by a short online interview. The criterion is motivation and interest in the topic. Previous Erasmus+ experience is explicitly irrelevant, and so are education level, artistic ability and fitness. Each group deliberately mixes participants who are currently struggling with exhaustion and participants who have already found something that works; that mix is where peer learning happens.
Inclusion. Each organisation includes young people facing at least one of the Programme Guide situations: health problems including mental health, economic, geographical and social barriers, and barriers linked to education systems. Participation costs nothing at any point; where someone cannot pay for a ticket and wait for reimbursement, their organisation or the host books it directly, written into the partnership agreement. Gender balance is a stated requirement: no gender above four of the seven participants in a group, tracked while applications are still open.
Group leaders are experienced youth workers or facilitators. What we ask for is someone who can sit with seven young people at the end of a long day, hear that one of them is not doing well, and hold that conversation without trying to fix it or turning it into a diagnosis. They run the daily reflection in their own language and report anything of concern the same evening. All four receive the same briefing from the Serbian partner’s psychologists, whether their organisation is experienced or new.
The partnership
Partners were chosen against four criteria: regular, direct contact with young people now; interest in this topic rather than any topic; complementarity across the four; and a group leader who can sit with a personal conversation without solving it. Two of the four are newcomers to the Programme, deliberately: they receive the method, call templates, infopack and selection materials at no cost, so a newcomer’s inexperience never shows up as a less prepared group of young people.
Programme
Ten days, eight of them working
Methods are non-formal throughout and there is not a single input session: guided writing, body mapping, world café, silent line, theatre-based scenes, silent solo exercises outdoors, photography, drawing, cooking, peer testing, a gallery walk and daily reflection. Participants work in seven international teams of four, mixed by country and mixed between those currently struggling and those who have found something that works. The full hour-by-hour programme is in the timetable annex of the application.
- 4sessions a day, heavier ones early and late
- Longshaded lunch break in the heat of the day
- Freeevening, every day
- 30′reflection in national groups, in their own language
Day 6 is a real hinge. The mid-term evaluation asks directly whether the group feels safe enough to be honest, and the second half of the programme is designed so it can be lightened, slowed or reordered on the basis of what participants say. The daily reflection with group leaders feeds the same process every evening.
The result
The Thyme Out kit
A deck of around sixty cards in four suits, written entirely by the participants, together with three session designs of different lengths and a short facilitator page on how to open and close a session. It is published as a free print-at-home file with no login, no cost and no registration, so a teacher, youth worker, school counsellor, scout leader or sports coach can download it, print it on ordinary paper and run something the same week.
Our team designs the layout and the visuals so the finished kit looks professional, and does not change the text. That rule holds even where a facilitator would phrase something more neatly, because a card in a young person’s own words is the whole point of the object. A second edition follows once the follow-up reports show which cards work with an audience that was not at the exchange.
The kit and the written methodology go to the Erasmus+ Project Results Platform and are shared through SALTO-YOUTH, under terms allowing free reuse, adaptation and translation. We would rather see the deck turn up in somebody else’s project, in a language we cannot read, than see it sit in an archive with our name on it.
The card texts do not exist yet. They are written in Rovies, in September 2027, by the people who will use them.
Around sixty cards in total; the split between suits is decided by the teams.
Three session designs
- 20 minutes — a teacher at the end of a class opens three cards with the room and gets a conversation that would otherwise take a whole workshop to reach.
- One hour — a youth worker runs a full session with a group of about twenty, with a room or a patch of grass and nothing else.
- Half a day — a whole afternoon from the same deck, the format the participants themselves deliver on Day 9.
It costs nothing to run, needs no specialist training, no software and no venue beyond a room or a patch of grass. An organisation can put it into its regular programme the month after the exchange, and because the cards are made by young people rather than written by a professional, the young people it is used with recognise the voice in them.
Impact
What changes, and for whom
For participants
Relief, early. Most young people carrying exhaustion assume it is a private failure of discipline. Within two working days they sit with seven people from four countries describing the same thing in different accents. A personal fault turns out to be a shared condition, and that changes what the rest of the week is possible to say.
Language. The difference between being tired and being depleted, between needing sleep and needing distance, between not wanting to and not being able to. By the end each can name at least three personal early signs, the ones that show up before a crash.
A set of things that work. Not advice, practices: a silent hour outdoors, a walk with no destination and no headphones, ten minutes of doing one thing with your hands, a phone left in a bag on purpose, cooking slowly with other people, swimming instead of scrolling. Each tried in company and reviewed honestly.
Making something real. Teams build the cards, watch their own wording fail in front of a group, rewrite it, hand over a finished deck, then run it as a real workshop in rotating pairs. Most have never facilitated anything before. They discover they can.
Comparison. An expectation that felt like simply how life works, about grades, about leaving home, about answering your boss at 22:00, turns out not to be asked of a person their age two countries away. That is the fastest route to seeing your own conditions clearly.
Afterwards. Every practice works with a pair of shoes, a park and twenty minutes. The kit is a file they keep. The local workshop and outdoor session put them in front of a real audience. Youthpass gives them language an employer recognises. And the group chats stay open.
For the organisations
A method, not a helpline number. Youth organisations meet burnout constantly and are rarely equipped for it: a volunteer stops answering, a reliable participant disappears mid-project. The kit gives them a structured, non-clinical way to open the subject that needs no professional in the room and does not pretend to be therapy — in three lengths, at zero cost, the month after the exchange.
A group leader who has done something hard. Eight daily reflections on a personal topic with seven young people, without turning them into counselling. That transfers into every future project and is one of the hardest skills to acquire from a manual.
A comparison you cannot get at home. Watching the same problem appear in four societies sharpens how an organisation reads its own young people afterwards.
A low-cost model and something to show. A campsite, an outdoor programme, gathered materials and seasonal food widen what partners can propose next. And an organisation that comes home with a finished, usable tool has something to put in front of the school, youth centre or municipality it wants to work with. For the two newcomers, one whole Youth Exchange cycle, from open call to reporting, carrying only the part they can already do well.
Beyond the project
Local
Each national group runs two activities within three months, planned on Day 8 with dates agreed before anyone leaves: a workshop with the kit in a place they already belong to — a school, a university department, a library, a youth centre, a sports club — and an open outdoor session in a park, forest path or shoreline, free, with nothing needed but the deck and the weather. Eight activities, 160 to 300 people, each ending with a short part on what Erasmus+ Youth Exchanges are and how to apply. Printed decks stay with the venues.
Regional and national
The kit travels without us. Any youth worker, teacher, school counsellor, scout leader or sports coach can download it and run a session the same week. A methodology that requires reading a forty-page report before use does not get used; this one needs paper, scissors and twenty minutes. The organisations pass it into the networks they already sit in, and present the method to their own wider teams rather than leaving it with the person who travelled.
European
The kit and its session designs go to the Erasmus+ Project Results Platform and SALTO-YOUTH under open terms. The project adds a small, practical, non-clinical contribution to a conversation currently held mostly in clinical or workplace terms — young people burn out before stable employment, and the youth sector has almost no tools for it — and it says honestly which parts of the design worked and which did not. It also connects two Youth Goals usually addressed separately.
Safety, quality, evaluation
Safety, and how we know it worked
Psychological safety rests on arrangements, not on a promise
The week asks people to talk about exhaustion and the parts of their life they are not coping with. Ženski Impuls, whose psychologists work with young people and families, writes the safety and referral protocol before the open call: what a facilitator does when a session goes further than planned, how a distressed participant leaves the room and with whom, who is told in what order, and where the line sits between a hard conversation and a situation that has to stop. All four organisations agree it and it is attached to the partnership agreements.
The right to step back from any activity without giving a reason is written into the group agreement on Day 2 and repeated before every heavier session. Opting out of the difficult version never leaves anyone sitting alone.
Confidentiality is agreed by the group: what is said in the room stays there, and nothing personal goes into the kit unless the person who said it puts it there.
A psychologist on site all week as the named contact for anything beyond what a group leader should hold, available to every group. Not a therapist’s role: no sessions, no cases — there so that a decision to stop something is made by someone qualified to make it.
Group leaders briefed one month before, by the psychologists, on one question: how to run a daily reflection about exhaustion without letting it turn into counselling, and what to do the moment it starts to. Each leaves with a one-page card of steps and a name to call at any hour.
Honest limits, from the open call onwards. This is peer learning run by youth workers, not treatment. Where a situation goes beyond what the team can safely hold, the participant is supported to reach professional care, the sending organisation is involved immediately, and the line is drawn by the psychologists who wrote the protocol.
Physical safety: the ordinary measures, done properly, by the sea in September
A venue and emergency briefing on the first day; a card for every participant with every coordinator’s, facilitator’s and group leader’s number and the nearest health centre; a first-aid-trained facilitator as the named person for health; a vehicle on site at all times; travel insurance and health coverage confirmed in writing by group leaders before departure. Heat: early starts, shade at every outdoor session, refillable bottles, nobody starts a walk without water and a hat. Water: swimming only at agreed times, never alone, never at night, never after alcohol, always with a team member present.
Evaluation at four points, each of which can change something
- DailyThirty minutes in national groups, in the participants’ own language; brought to the evening debrief and changing the next day’s pacing when needed.
- Mid-term, Day 6A short form used that same evening. It asks whether the group feels safe enough to be honest — the precondition for everything else.
- Final, Day 9Youthpass self-assessment plus an anonymous questionnaire mapped onto the four objectives: three early signs named; what the offline experiment changed; practices tried and kept; two confirmed local dates per group.
- Three months onA follow-up survey on the local activities and on whether participants have kept any of the practices themselves. Outputs tracked alongside: kit published, eight activities, audience reached, downloads and their countries.
Erasmus Youth Quality Standards are the structure, not a reference at the end: written partnership agreements and accession forms signed before implementation; a shared tracker holding the state of every group; deadlines two weeks ahead of the point where a delay would affect anyone; documentation collected as it happens; thresholds that trigger action by a number rather than a feeling; reserve lists of organisations and participants for the parts that can fail.
Sustainability
Green, in two layers
How the project is run
- Green travel first. Bus, train or ferry before flights; groups travel together; within Greece by road and ferry with the host arranging transfers; where flying is the only realistic option, we say so.
- A campsite, not a hotel. Tents in an olive grove use a fraction of the energy and water of a conference venue; the programme runs outdoors or in shade rather than air conditioning.
- Food. Cooked on site, local and seasonal, mostly plant-based, portions planned from the dietary form; refillable bottles; waste separated.
- Materials gathered, reused or nothing at all. Card prototypes on reused card and paper; collage material from old magazines and packaging; no printed handouts and no printed infopack; the final deck printed on recycled card in a small run.
- Leave no trace on every walk; herbs gathered under a strict rule of taking very little and never from a single plant.
What the week is about
This is where the project differs from one that adds a green section: the environmental content is the method. A full working day is spent walking, sitting and eating in a landscape, and the point being made is that the most effective free resource for recovery available to a young person is a place outdoors near where they live. Participants come out of that day with a personal reason to care about green space that no campaign produces: they have felt the difference themselves.
The hillsides above Rovies burned in 2021 and are growing back unevenly. Walking through them makes two arguments at once, one about how long recovery takes and one about what happens to a landscape under too much pressure. Nobody has to explain the parallel.
Everything they learn works with paper, a pen, a pair of shoes and a park.
The sustainable choices are named out loud on the first working day, briefly, as decisions the group is making together: why a campsite, why no handouts, why second-hand materials, why the food is what it is, why we take almost nothing from the hillside.
Host and applicant
Sapere Aude Greece
An informal group of young people working through non-formal education on human rights, participation, wellbeing and ecology. Members have completed Council of Europe training in human rights education. For this project it brings the topic, the two facilitators, the programme design, the infopack, the venue in Rovies and the production of the kit, and carries the administrative weight so that partners spend their effort on their groups.
This site accompanies an Erasmus+ KA152-YOU application submitted in Greece. The project is subject to approval and to the availability of funds.
How to take part
The open call for participants opens after approval, at least three months before the activity, through the channels of all four organisations: schools, universities, vocational centres, youth centres, libraries, sports and hiking clubs, municipal youth desks — and personal invitations from youth workers, teachers and coaches who know someone worth encouraging. Previous Erasmus+ experience is irrelevant. A basic level of English is enough. Participation costs nothing.
- Sapere Aude Greece · GR
- Ženski Impuls · Novi Sad, RS
- The Mindset Society · Będzin, PL
- Bloom Beyond · Ruse, BG